>> On Feb 7, 11:37 pm, David <dimla...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Feb 7, 11:30 pm, s0183616 <s0183...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> > > WQ wrote:
>> > > > Ken from Chicago wrote:
>> > > >> FINALLY! We don't just get answers.
>>
>> > > >> But the lostaways finally start ASKING questions!
>>
>> > > > --- If it took 73 episodes to get to this point, I guess you'll
>> > > > have
>> > > > to wade through another 73 episodes before it FINALLY concludes.
>> > > > Imagine that, 146 episodes to tell a story that could've been done
>> > > > much more efficiently within a 2-hour movie or much more concisely
>> > > > within a single season. Meaning it's essentially got at least 5
>> > > > years
>> > > > of plot fat in it.
>>
>> > > Clearly you have no clue. Why are you here? To troll?
>>
>> > Comedy relief.
>>
>> --- The real joke is on Lost viewers. There's absolutely nothing,
>> nil, nada, naught that the producers can come up with that'll be a
>> slam-bang, blow-me-totally-away kind of ending to this series. Its
>> interminably overly protracted nature negates any likelihood of such a
>> fantastic conclusion ever being realized. Expect to be hugely
>> disappointed in the finale after all the time you will have invested
>> in this series and completely pissed off that everyone connected with
>> the show has lined their pockets with oodles of cash for having sucked
>> and strung along all the unsuspecting suckers out there into it. I
>> kid you not.
> Never save your best balloon animal until the end of the show.
David
The Translucen…
