> On Feb 7, 11:37 pm, David <dimla...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Feb 7, 11:30 pm, s0183616 <s0183...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > WQ wrote:
> > > > Ken from Chicago wrote:
> > > >> FINALLY! We don't just get answers.
>
> > > >> But the lostaways finally start ASKING questions!
>
> > > > --- If it took 73 episodes to get to this point, I guess you'll have
> > > > to wade through another 73 episodes before it FINALLY concludes.
> > > > Imagine that, 146 episodes to tell a story that could've been done
> > > > much more efficiently within a 2-hour movie or much more concisely
> > > > within a single season. Meaning it's essentially got at least 5 years
> > > > of plot fat in it.
>
> > > Clearly you have no clue. Why are you here? To troll?
>
> > Comedy relief.
>
> --- The real joke is on Lost viewers. There's absolutely nothing,
> nil, nada, naught that the producers can come up with that'll be a
> slam-bang, blow-me-totally-away kind of ending to this series. Its
> interminably overly protracted nature negates any likelihood of such a
> fantastic conclusion ever being realized. Expect to be hugely
> disappointed in the finale after all the time you will have invested
> in this series and completely pissed off that everyone connected with
> the show has lined their pockets with oodles of cash for having sucked
> and strung along all the unsuspecting suckers out there into it. I
> kid you not.
David
The Translucen…
