On Fri, 8 Feb 2008 Tikbalang wrote:
>Let's take a quick look at the total impossibility that you could set
>up a fake plane crash site and get away with it. First you need all
>the material for the fake crash on standby and ready to deploy faster
>than the search and rescues crews.
You're thinking linearly. If, as has been theorised by many, someone
manipulated certain individuals onto Flight 815 with the prior intent of
crashing it onto the island, then the fake wreck in the Sunda Trench may
have been put there long BEFORE the loss of the real aircraft. It's
still not trivial, but it's much easier to fake something before the
world's media is stirred into a search frenzy.
> Material would include a look alike
>airplane and look alike freshly dead bodies to match the general
>appearance of all the passengers.
Again, easier to achieve if you already know who the passengers are
going to be. See above.
> You also need to dress up your
>corpses with identification papers, personal effects, heirloom
>jewelry, and recent dental work.
Ditto.
>(Not to mention matching DNA, I don't
>want to get too scientific here.) That's quite a shopping list. Even
>if you did have all that ready to go (which is 99.9% impossible and/or
>unbelievable) next there would be thousands of investigators crawling
>all over the fake wreck with fine tooth combs. So you can't deploy the
>fake wreck in time and the fake wreck could never be good enough to
>pass a typical plane wreck scrutiny.
I will agree with you on the investigation. If independent NTSB or
equivalent agents get their hands on the wreckage or bodies they're
going to realise there's something amiss. If this is indeed a faked
crash then clearly something will have to happen to prevent that.
Kev
__________________________________________________________________________
"English sparrows and starlings eat the farmer's grain and soil
his corpse." School examination answer
ChrisRiley
thinbluemime
