On Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:09:26 -0700, Scott Bryce
<sbryce@scottbryce.com> wrote:
>Steven L. wrote:
>> As I said, none of that is necessary because evidently the fake plane
>> was deposited in water too deep for any artifacts to be recovered.
>
>I am questioning the fake plane theory. loading something as large as a
>757 onto a boat, taking it out into the ocean and dropping it overboard
>does not go unnoticed. I don't think there is any way that a fake plane
>could be planted in the ocean and have the whole thing kept secret.
THANK YOU!!! I have been thinking the same thing. Well almost. Not
only does something like this go unnoticed, it also seems virtually
impossible. What vessel would be large enough to haul a whole plane?
Seems highly unlikely. Even if they only took a couple or three
sections and could find something that could haul them, lowering them
so that they perfectly aligned would be no easy task.
Also, the fake crash seems to implicate Oceanic Airlines as being a
co-conspirator with the organization that is behind all of this. I
can't just say, oh I better fake a crash site and run to the corner
convenience store and buy me a plane.
ChrisRiley
thinbluemime
