On Feb 7, 11:37 pm, David <dimla...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Feb 7, 11:30 pm, s0183616 <s0183...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > WQ wrote:
> > > Ken from Chicago wrote:
> > >> FINALLY! We don't just get answers.
>
> > >> But the lostaways finally start ASKING questions!
>
> > > --- If it took 73 episodes to get to this point, I guess you'll have
> > > to wade through another 73 episodes before it FINALLY concludes.
> > > Imagine that, 146 episodes to tell a story that could've been done
> > > much more efficiently within a 2-hour movie or much more concisely
> > > within a single season. Meaning it's essentially got at least 5 years
> > > of plot fat in it.
>
> > Clearly you have no clue. Why are you here? To troll?
>
> Comedy relief.
--- The real joke is on Lost viewers. There's absolutely nothing,
nil, nada, naught that the producers can come up with that'll be a
slam-bang, blow-me-totally-away kind of ending to this series. Its
interminably overly protracted nature negates any likelihood of such a
fantastic conclusion ever being realized. Expect to be hugely
disappointed in the finale after all the time you will have invested
in this series and completely pissed off that everyone connected with
the show has lined their pockets with oodles of cash for having sucked
and strung along all the unsuspecting suckers out there into it. I
kid you not.
David
The Translucen…
