> WQ wrote:
>> On Feb 8, 12:06 am, s0183616 <s0183...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> WQ wrote:
>>>> On Feb 7, 11:57 pm, s0183616 <s0183...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>> WQ wrote:
>>>>>> On Feb 7, 11:53 pm, s0183616 <s0183...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> WQ wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Feb 7, 11:37 pm, David <dimla...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Feb 7, 11:30 pm, s0183616 <s0183...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> WQ wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Ken from Chicago wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> FINALLY! We don't just get answers.
>>>>>>>>>>>> But the lostaways finally start ASKING questions!
>>>>>>>>>>> --- If it took 73 episodes to get to this point, I guess you'll
>>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>>> to wade through another 73 episodes before it FINALLY concludes.
>>>>>>>>>>> Imagine that, 146 episodes to tell a story that could've been
>>>>>>>>>>> done
>>>>>>>>>>> much more efficiently within a 2-hour movie or much more
>>>>>>>>>>> concisely
>>>>>>>>>>> within a single season. Meaning it's essentially got at least 5
>>>>>>>>>>> years
>>>>>>>>>>> of plot fat in it.
>>>>>>>>>> Clearly you have no clue. Why are you here? To troll?
>>>>>>>>> Comedy relief.
>>>>>>>> --- The real joke is on Lost viewers. There's absolutely nothing,
>>>>>>>> nil, nada, naught that the producers can come up with that'll be a
>>>>>>>> slam-bang, blow-me-totally-away kind of ending to this series.
>>>>>>> So? Haven't you ever heard that is about the journey, not the
>>>>>>> ending.
>>>>>>> See Stephen King's Dark Tower series for an example.
>>>>>> --- Oh, please, don't bore me. If I wanted to take a 'journey,' I'd
>>>>>> go to the French Riviera, not watch a do-nothing, go-nowhere show for
>>>>>> 6 years.
>>>>> Fine. Stop watching and enjoy all the other great stuff on TV.
>>>> --- I stopped watching 5 minutes into the pilot 3 1/2 years ago, and
>>>> I''m still trying to find other great stuff to watch on TV.
>>> You stopped watching Lost after 5 minutes and you are posting about it?
>>
>> --- Yeah, I stopped watching Lost after the first 5 minutes of the
>> pilot because when I saw it took that long to show the plane going
>> down with all its overacted onboard hysterics, that's when I knew it
>> would take forever for this show to tell its story. And I can post
>> whatever I want. What are you, a Communist Chinese?
>
> No, go right ahead. Declare your idiocy. I have no problem with that.
>
>>> I hope you're a troll, because if you aren't, you are an idiot.
>>
>> --- Hey, I'm the one who's taking a 'journey' to the French Riviera to
>> check out topless babes, you're the one taking a 'journey' at home
>> watching an endless soapy fantasy on TV for 6 years. Which one is the
>> real idiot?
>
> Still a * troll. Or an idiot. Your pick. I don't care which.
ignore the old fashioned way. Pretty pathetic that someone would take the
time to troll a newsgroup of a show he grew weary of years ago. I'm sure
shorts...with a big jar of hand cream.
David
The Translucen…
