> >> On Feb 7, 11:37 pm, David <dimla...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> > On Feb 7, 11:30 pm, s0183616 <s0183...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > > WQ wrote:
> >> > > > Ken from Chicago wrote:
> >> > > >> FINALLY! We don't just get answers.
> >>
> >> > > >> But the lostaways finally start ASKING questions!
> >>
> >> > > > --- If it took 73 episodes to get to this point, I guess you'll
> >> > > > have
> >> > > > to wade through another 73 episodes before it FINALLY concludes.
> >> > > > Imagine that, 146 episodes to tell a story that could've been done
> >> > > > much more efficiently within a 2-hour movie or much more concisely
> >> > > > within a single season. Meaning it's essentially got at least 5
> >> > > > years
> >> > > > of plot fat in it.
> >>
> >> > > Clearly you have no clue. Why are you here? To troll?
> >>
> >> > Comedy relief.
> >>
> >> --- The real joke is on Lost viewers. There's absolutely nothing,
> >> nil, nada, naught that the producers can come up with that'll be a
> >> slam-bang, blow-me-totally-away kind of ending to this series. Its
> >> interminably overly protracted nature negates any likelihood of such a
> >> fantastic conclusion ever being realized. Expect to be hugely
> >> disappointed in the finale after all the time you will have invested
> >> in this series and completely pissed off that everyone connected with
> >> the show has lined their pockets with oodles of cash for having sucked
> >> and strung along all the unsuspecting suckers out there into it. I
> >> kid you not.
> > Never save your best balloon animal until the end of the show.